INTERPRETIVE NOTICE
The Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000 (CFMA), which was signed into law on December 21, 2000, lifts the 18-year ban on single-stock futures and narrow-based security indices ("security futures products"). Unlike other futures contracts, however, the CFMA provides that security futures products are securities as well as futures. Therefore, under Section 15A(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act), NFA is a national securities association (NSA) for the limited purpose of regulating the activities of Members who are registered as brokers or dealers in security futures products under Section 15(b)(11) of the Exchange Act (i.e., FCMs and IBs who "passport" in to broker-dealer registration because they limit their securities activities to security futures products).
NFA Compliance Rule 2-29 imposes high standards on Members' and Associates' communications with the public in connection with any of their futures activities. When regulating the securities futures activities of Members registered as broker-dealers under Section 15(b)(11) of the Exchange Act, however, Section 15A(k)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act requires NFA to impose sales practice and promotional material requirements reasonably comparable to those of national securities associations registered under Section 15A(a) of the Exchange Act. In light of those requirements, this notice reiterates some of the requirements that apply to all products and describes some of the additional requirements imposed by new section (j) of Compliance Rule 2-29. Section (j) applies to the security futures activities of those Members who are registered as broker-dealers under Section 15(b)(11) of the Exchange Act and their Associates. Sections (a)-(i) apply to all Members.
The requirements described in this interpretation are in addition to — and do not in any way limit or amend — any other requirements imposed by NFA rules, including those discussed in other interpretations issued by the Board of Directors.
Use of Misleading Statements
NFA Compliance Rule 2-29(b)(1) prohibits the use of promotional material that is likely to deceive the public. Additionally, NFA Compliance Rule 2-29(b)(2) prohibits the use of promotional material which contains any material misstatement of fact or which the Member or Associate knows omits a fact which causes the material to be misleading. NFA has always considered the following items to be violations of these Rules:
Use of Past or Projected Performance
NFA Compliance Rule 2-29 places certain limitations on the use of past or projected performance in communications with the public. Some of those limitations — most of which apply to all futures contracts regardless of the underlying commodity — are discussed in this section.
Provided that the performance is representative of all reasonably comparable accounts, most promotional material may discuss past performance of actual or recommended transactions if it meets a number of standards.
Promotional material that discusses projected performance must also meet a number of standards.
Annual rates of return may not be used in any promotional material unless they are based on 12 consecutive months of actual performance, and they must be calculated in a manner consistent with CFTC Regulation 4.25(a)(7)(i)(F). (See NFA Compliance Rule 2-29(b)(5).) Furthermore, the promotional material must state that past results are not necessarily indicative of future results. (See NFA Compliance Rule 2-29(b)(4).)
NFA Compliance Rule 2-29(j) imposes additional restrictions on promotional material of Members registered as broker-dealers under Section 15(b)(11) of the Exchange Act and their Associates if the promotional material specifically refers to security futures products. Where the promotional material is accompanied or preceded by the disclosure statement for security futures products, references to past recommendations must include all of the information described in Compliance Rule 2-29(j)(9), and references to current recommendations must include instructions on how to obtain that information. However, promotional material for these products may not contain any discussion of past or projected performance unless accompanied or preceded by the disclosure statement for security futures products. This means that most forms of mass media advertising cannot discuss past or projected performance.
Research reports for underlying securities are not promotional material under NFA Compliance Rule 2-29 merely because the customers who receive the reports may trade security futures products in those securities. Compliance Rule 2-29 does, however, cover any research report that mentions security futures products or discusses any strategy that includes using security futures products.
Disclosing Conflicts of Interest in Security Futures Products by Members Registered as Broker-Dealers Under Section 15(b)(11) of the Exchange Act
Due to the nature of the securities markets, Members may have special conflicts of interest that may not necessarily be known to their customers. NFA Compliance Rule 2-29(j)(11) - which applies to Members registered as broker-dealers under Section 15(b)(11) of the Exchange Act - provides that promotional material that makes a recommendation regarding security futures products must disclose material conflicts of interest that the Member may have due to its activities in the underlying security. In particular, the promotional material must disclose any of the following conflicts, if applicable:
6 See, In the Matter of MBH Commodity Advisors, Inc., NFA Case No. 96-BCC-015 (Hearing Panel, May 5, 1998), aff'd, NFA Case No. 98-APP-001 (App. Comm., Feb. 19, 1999); aff'd, CFTC Docket No. CRAA 99-3 (CFTC, Mar. 31, 2000), aff'd, MBH Commodity Advisors, Inc. v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, No. 00-1957, 7th Cir., May 7, 2001.
7See, In re Universal Commodity Corporation, NFA Case No. 95-BCC-20 (Hearing Panel, Feb. 3, 1998), aff'd, In re Parks, NFA Case Nos. 98-APP-1, 98-APP-2, and 98-APP-3 (App. Comm., Mar. 14, 2000); In re JCC, Inc., NFA Case No. 90-BCC-30 (Aug. 25, 1992); aff'd, NFA Case Nos. 92-APP-2 through 92-APP-8 (App. Comm., July 19, 1993); aff'd, CFTC Docket No. CRAA 93-6 (CFTC, June 29, 1994).
8 See, In re Filler Zaner & Associates, NFA Case No. 89-BCC-32 (BCC, Nov. 30, 1989).