|2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 | 1996|
The CFMA lifted the 18-year ban on single stock futures and narrow-based security indices (security futures products) and regulates these products as both securities and futures. The CFMA amended Section 15A of the Exchange Act to add a new subsection (k), which makes NFA a national securities association for the limited purpose of regulating the activities of Members who are registered as brokers or dealers in security futures products under Section 15(b)(11) of the Exchange Act, which was also added by the CFMA. Section 15A(k)(2) requires NFA to have anti-fraud, anti-manipulation, and customer protection rules reasonably comparable to those of NASD Regulation, Inc. (NASDR) for the purpose of governing the security futures activities of these Section 15(b)(11) broker-dealers.
NFA already has anti-fraud, anti-manipulation, and customer protection rules that have proven effective in governing the futures activities of its Members. However, NFA's rules sometimes take a different approach than NASDR's rules and, as a result, they do not correspond in every instance. Therefore, NFA has adopted the proposed rule changes in order to ensure that NFA meets the standards imposed by Section 15A(k)(2).
In NFA staff's discussions with SEC staff, SEC staff told us that NFA's rules should be comparable to those NASDR rules that apply to options since both are derivative transactions. SEC staff also told NFA to include those rules that apply to writing options since the risks of futures transactions are more similar to the risks of writing options than to the risks of purchasing them. These principles guided NFA in developing the proposed rule changes. A more detailed discussion of the rule changes follows.
Bylaw 1101 (Doing Business With Non-Members)
Bylaw 1101 prohibits Members from doing business with non-Members who are required to be registered with the CFTC as futures commission merchants (FCMs), introducing brokers (IBs), commodity pool operators (CPOs), or commodity trading advisors (CTAs). Section 4f(a)(4)(C) of the CEA provides that registered futures associations may not prohibit their Members from doing security futures business with FCMs and IBs registered under Section 4f(a)(2) of the CEA. Bylaw 1101 has been amended accordingly.
Bylaw 1507, Compliance Rule 1-1, and Code of Arbitration Section 1 (Definitions)
The definition of futures has been amended to include security futures products. The amendments make it clear that NFA has both compliance and arbitration jurisdiction over security futures transactions involving its Members.
Compliance Rule 1-1 has also been amended to add a definition of "Exchange Act," since the Exchange Act is now referred to in a number of places in the Compliance Rules.
Compliance Rule 2-7 (Designated Security Futures Principals)
Proposed Compliance Rule 2-7(b) requires Members who register as broker-dealers under Section 15(b)(11) of the Exchange Act (passported Members) to designate one or more security futures principal and requires the principal to take the Series 30 examination (for futures branch office managers), which will be updated to include questions regarding supervision of activities involving security futures products.1 This is comparable to NASDR Conduct Rule 1022(f) which requires NASDR members who engage in options transactions to have at least one registered options principal.
For passported Members, corresponding changes to Compliance Rules 2-8, 2-29, and 2-30 require a designated security futures principal to review discretionary trades, approve promotional material, and approve customer accounts for security futures transactions.
Compliance Rules 2-22 and 2-26
Compliance Rule 2-22 has been amended to prohibit Members from implying that they have been sponsored, recommended, or approved by any federal or state regulatory body. This makes it comparable to NASDR Conduct Rule 2210(d)(2)(J).
CFTC Regulations 155.3 and 155.4 dictate the terms under which an associated person (AP) of one Member can open and trade an account with another Member. Compliance Rule 2-26 has been amended to incorporate these regulations in order to make it comparable to NASDR Conduct Rule 3050.
Compliance Rule 2-29 (Promotional Material)
NFA's and NASDR's promotional material rules are comparable for the most part. NASDR's rules do, however, contain several requirements that are either not included or not explicitly stated in NFA's rules. The amendments to Compliance Rule 2-29 are intended to make it more like NASDR's promotional material rules in the way it applies to promotional material for security futures products.
The amendment to Compliance Rule 2-29(b) adds new sub-section (6) regarding testimonials. This requirement is actually stricter than NASDR Conduct Rule 2210(d)(2)(D), which is the comparable NASDR requirement, since the proposed NFA requirement actually prohibits the use of any testimonial that is not representative of all reasonably comparable accounts.
A new section (j) has been added to be comparable with various requirements in NASDR Conduct Rules 2210 and 2220. This section applies only to promotional material of passported Members (and their Associates) that specifically refers to security futures products. Among other things, Compliance Rule 2-29(j):
Compliance Rule 2-30 (Suitability)
Two statutory provisions effectively require NFA to have suitability rules comparable to those of NASDR. First, the suitability requirements are customer protection rules that are included in the requirements for qualification under Section 15A(k). Second, the listing requirements in Section 2(a)(1)(D)(i)(V) of the CEA essentially bar transactions by FCMs, IBs, CTAs, CPOs, and APs that are not subject to suitability requirements comparable to those of NASDR.
NFA Compliance Rule 2-30 requires Members (and their Associates) to obtain information about each customer's experience, income, net worth and age before opening a futures account. It also requires Members to give risk disclosure, with the risk disclosures required by the CFTC as the minimum. Compliance Rule 2-30 requires Members to provide additional risk disclosure if the customer needs it to make an informed judgment about whether he or she should be involved in the futures markets. In fact, if the Member believes that futures are simply too risky for that customer, the Member must tell the customer that he has no business trading futures. This is true even if the Member makes no recommendations whatsoever to the customer. If the customer still decides to trade futures, however, the Member may open the account.
Like NASDR requirements, Compliance Rule 2-30 is designed to keep customers from trading futures if they are unsuitable. Unlike NFA Compliance Rule 2-30, however, NASDR Conduct Rules 2310, 2860(16), 2860(19), and IM-2860-2 1) require members to obtain more extensive information from natural person customers, 2) require members to specifically approve or disapprove security options accounts based on an evaluation of the customer's suitability to trade those products, and (3) explicitly prohibit members from making unsuitable recommendations. Therefore, NFA has added a new section (j) to Compliance Rule 2-30 to include these requirements for security futures and apply them to NFA Members who are not also members of NASDR (and therefore are not subject to NASDR's suitability requirements).
NFA and a number of other self-regulatory organizations are currently drafting a standardized disclosure statement that must be given to all security futures customers. Compliance Rule 2-30(b) has been revised to require Members to provide this statement when or before an account is approved to trade security futures products.
Compliance Rule 2-37 (Security Futures Products)
Compliance Rule 2-37 is an entirely new rule that applies only to the security futures activities of passported Members and their Associates.
Interpretive Notice Regarding Enhanced Supervisory Requirements
This notice, found at Paragraph 9021 of the National Futures Association Manual, requires enhanced supervisory procedures for firms that have a significant number of Associates who were previously employed at firms closed down for sales practice fraud. Although the notice is generally stricter than NASDR Conduct Rule 3010(b)(2), which is the comparable NASDR requirement, it has been amended to provide that firms must have written supervisory procedures for complying with the requirements of the notice and all applicable provisions of the securities laws and must file quarterly reports with NFA concerning their compliance with the requirements of the notice.
Interpretive Notice Regarding Obligations to Customers and Other Market Participants
Both NFA and NASDR have rules prohibiting their respective Members from engaging in conduct inconsistent with just and equitable principles of trade as well as manipulative or fraudulent practices. See NFA Compliance Rules 2-2 and 2-4 and NASDR Conduct Rules 2110 and 2120. Nonetheless, several NASDR interpretive memoranda explicitly prohibit some specific conduct that has not been explicitly prohibited by NFA rules or interpretive notices. NFA's new interpretive notice explicitly prohibits this conduct.
One of the lynchpins of the futures industry is the concept that registrants may not trade ahead of customer orders. Most, if not all, of the futures exchanges have rules prohibiting their members from engaging in this conduct, and CFTC Regulations 155.3(a) and 155.4(a) require FCMs and IBs to have and enforce procedures to insure that they and their employees do not trade ahead of customer orders. Although NFA does not have a specific requirement prohibiting Members and Associates from trading ahead of customer orders, NFA has always considered it a violation of Compliance Rule 2-4. However, in order to make NFA rules more comparable to NASDR IM-2110-2, NFA has specifically prohibited that conduct in this new interpretive notice. As noted previously, CFTC Regulations 155.3 and 155.4 have also been incorporated by reference into NFA Compliance Rule 2-26.
This interpretive notice also contains several provisions that apply only to passported Members and their Associates when they engage in security futures activities. These provisions: 1) prohibit trading ahead of research reports (comparable to NASDR IM-2110-4); 2) prohibit trading based on knowledge of an imminent block transaction (generally comparable to NASDR IM-2110-3), with an exception for hedging counterparty risk under approved exchange block rules; and 3) require a sound basis for evaluating the facts regarding a particular security futures product (comparable to NASDR Conduct Rule 2210(d)(1)(A)).
Interpretive Notice Regarding Special Supervisory Requirements for Members Registered as Broker-Dealers Under Section 15(b)(11) of the Securities Act of 1934
Both NFA and NASDR have extensive requirements regarding supervision. In some areas, however, NASDR's requirements are more detailed than NFA's. Therefore, NFA has adopted a new interpretive notice to NFA Compliance Rule 2-9 (Supervision) regarding Special Supervisory Requirements for Security Futures Products. The interpretive notice, which applies only to security futures activities by passported Members, is intended to be comparable to various supervisory requirements in NASDR Conduct Rules 2210(f), 2860(18), 2860(20), and 3010.
Among other things, this interpretive notice requires that:
Interpretive Notice on Use of Past or Projected Performance and Disclosing Conflicts of Interest for Security Futures Products
NFA has also adopted a new interpretive notice to NFA Compliance Rule 2-29 on Use of Past or Projected Performance and Disclosing Conflicts of Interest for Security Futures Products. The notice mostly describes positions taken by NFA's Business Conduct Committee and Hearing Panels regarding past and projected performance and is intended to be comparable to some of the specific provisions of NASDR Conduct Rules 2210 and 2220. It also explains the responsibilities of passported Members under new section (j) of Compliance Rule 2-29.
* * *