2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1997|
Email This to a Friend
October 17, 2003
Senior Vice President, Planning and Development
National Futures Association
IOSCO Annual Meeting
October 17, 2003
Introduction and Overview
Ladies and Gentlemen:
I would also like to extend my thanks to our gracious hosts. As Chairman Lee mentioned in his invitation letter to this conference, as the inter-connectedness of global financial markets continues to increase, international cooperation is necessary to restore investor confidence and to lay the groundwork for future growth. In my remarks today I plan to give you a brief overview of how NFA operates, some of the regulatory issues we are facing and share with you some of the regulatory tools that help us be better regulators.
Let me provide a brief overview of NFA. NFA is the industrywide self-regulatory organization for the U.S. futures industry. NFA occupies a unique position in the futures industry. We are a self-regulatory body, but we do not operate a marketplace. Self-regulation is not part of what we do - it is all that we do. We are first, foremost and only a regulatory body devoted to customer protection.
NFA is subject to oversight by the CFTC and has four Congressionally-mandated areas of responsibility:
Any firm or individual who conducts business on any U.S. futures exchange on behalf of the investing public is required to register with the CFTC and be a Member of NFA. Our 4,000 Members include futures commission merchants ("FCMs"), introducing brokers ("IBs"), commodity pool operators ("CPOs") and commodity trading advisors ("CTAs"). We also regulate the activities of approximately 50,000 registered account executives who work for those Members. Our mission is to work as a partner with the CFTC to provide the industry with regulation that is effective. In the twenty-one years since NFA began operation, trading volume on U.S. futures exchanges has increased by over 400%. During that same time, customer complaints have actually dropped by over 70%.
We all know, though, that a successful past does not ensure a successful future. The need for regulation that is both effective and efficient has never been greater. Effective regulation is the best way to assure public confidence, and we have all seen what happens to markets that lose the public's confidence. The best way to preserve that confidence is to deserve it - to ensure that the highest levels of integrity are demanded of all market participants and intermediaries.
Efficient regulation is not just a question of how you write the rules - it also involves making the best use of regulatory resources. For the last twenty years the CFTC has delegated certain of its frontline regulatory responsibilities to NFA to avoid duplication of effort and to direct its own resources where they are most needed. That trend has continued and accelerated since the passage of the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000 (CFMA).
What else can we do to combat financial crime globally? We need to change the mindset that all regulators can lapse into-reacting to the last problem instead of anticipating the next one. The members of the SRO have to be partners in that process. Senior staff from NFA try to visit as many of our members as we can for one-on-one meetings, not to talk about the last audit but to talk about what's going on in the industry. What we are working on and, more importantly, what we should be working on. The U.S. futures industry has been relatively scandal free in recent years, but we cannot kid ourselves into a false sense of security. We work with both our members and with the Commission staff to try to think about any ticking time bombs that could be out there. We need to do more of that.
Retail Forex Transactions
There are a number of important customer protection issues we are working on today. The first area relates to off-exchange foreign currency transactions with retail customers. The Commodity Futures Modernization Act ("CFMA") makes clear the Commission's authority and jurisdiction to investigate and take action to close down entities selling illegal off-exchange foreign currency futures and option contracts to retail customers. Since the CFMA became effective in December 2000, the CFTC has been very active in applying the statute to retail forex activities and has filed numerous cases against forex entities, involving hundreds of millions taken from thousands of victims.
The CFMA provides that firms can offer off-exchange foreign currency (forex) transactions to retail customers if they qualify as "otherwise regulated entities", such as FCMs, broker-dealers and insurance companies. However, persons actually working the phones selling the product can be completely unregulated. Hundreds of unregulated entities currently solicit business on behalf of Forex Dealer Members. In fact, NFA has received information that several individuals either disciplined or expelled from the futures industry have been linked to these soliciting firms.
To address these problems, we created a special Forex Dealer membership category for firms that register as FCMs so they can act as a counterparty to retail forex transactions. In the last eighteen months, we have reviewed over one hundred customer complaints relating to these firms' forex activities. NFA has also taken several emergency actions against Members for forex activities within the last twenty months. Due to the disproportionate number of complaints we have received relating to these transactions, forex clearly has demanded a lot of our regulatory resources during the last year.
NFA also developed rules which will go into effect on December 1 designed to protect retail forex customers against unethical business practices and loss of funds due to insolvency or related problems. We will continue to monitor this area and may propose additional rules to protect investors.
Another regulatory issue I wanted to address is anti-money laundering ("AML"). All of the financial regulators have adopted or are adopting all of the anti-money laundering rules required by the USA Patriot Act. The question now becomes how best to monitor all of the affected firms for compliance. As always, NFA's goal is to make the most efficient use of the regulatory resources that are available.
The USA Patriot Act imposes significant new AML requirements on all financial institutions. NFA adopted requirements necessitating that FCMs and IBs have an AML program. NFA worked very closely with the Commission, U.S. Department of Treasury, and the industry in adopting these requirements. At the present time, NFA examines FCM and IB Member firms for compliance with these requirements and has worked with firms to ensure that they fully understand the elements of an effective AML program.
We also expect that Treasury in the near future will issue final AML rules for CTAs and unregistered investment companies, including commodity pools. At that time, we will adopt AML requirements for these Members and add steps to our audit programs to check for compliance with those rules. The fact is, though, that many of our CPO members operate other types of investment funds, either directly through our Member firm or though an affiliate of our Member firm. For example, 18 of the top 25 (55 of the top 100) hedge fund complexes are operated by NFA Member CPOs or their affiliates. Since we will already be auditing our Member firms for AML compliance, it only makes sense that we should examine their other funds and their affiliates for AML compliance as well. That's an allocation of resources that makes sense, and we have informed the Treasury Department that we would be willing to take on that additional responsibility.
Investor Education, Information-Sharing, and Training
I would now like to focus on another customer protection issue and the continuing need to increase information sharing among regulators around the world. Investors are now confronted with a multitude of trading opportunities from around the globe. How must we as regulators adapt to this new environment?
First and foremost, regulatory organizations must continue to make a strong commitment to investor education. Education is the first line of defense against fraud. Investors must understand the product they intend to trade, know that the marketplace has a strong reputation for market integrity, or not, and have knowledge of any disciplinary history of the intermediaries and brokers with whom they are doing business. No investor, big or small, can avoid doing rigorous due diligence, and we as regulators must do everything we can to help investors get this information quickly and easily.
At National Futures Association, we have always had a strong investor education program. We have published several brochures on investing in general and on the specific opportunities and risks associated with trading derivatives. Recognizing the need to make this information easily accessible to investors around the globe, NFA also provides the same information on its web site.
We have also found other ways to provide information to investors. Over seven years ago, we introduced the Background Affiliation Status Information Center (BASIC). BASIC, which can be accessed through NFA's web site. BASIC contains current and historical registration information concerning all current and former CFTC registrants. It also provides information concerning disciplinary actions taken by NFA, the CFTC and all the U.S. futures exchanges. Investors and regulatory bodies around the world use this system. The success of BASIC is reflected in the fact that the system receives more than 50,000 inquiries each month.
As a result of the success of BASIC, the CFTC approached us to help them develop a system that will provide international regulators with the information they need regarding U.S. registrants that conduct business in other jurisdictions.
This new system, called the International Regulators Alert System, incorporates elements of the BASIC system and NFA's Online Registration System. If a U.S. firm intends to do business in another jurisdiction, a regulator can request via e-mail all regulatory information relevant to that firm. That regulatory information will include registration status and history and all disciplinary actions taken against a firm by a U.S. futures exchange, the CFTC and NFA. Once the initial request is made, the system will automatically send the regulator quarterly notices. More urgent information regarding the firm (e.g., withdrawal from membership, disciplinary actions, etc.) will be sent to the regulator immediately. If anyone in today's audience is interested in getting more information about this system, please give me your card today or send me an e-mail.
As part of our ongoing commitment to facilitate cooperation and share our regulatory knowledge and expertise, NFA provides focused training courses to exchanges and regulators. NFA staff has visited Singapore, we have trained a delegation from KOFEX in Chicago, and last month we provided a very successful two-week training program to the China Futures Association and the China Securities Regulatory Commission. As well, earlier this year NFA participated in a training course in Lithuania with the Financial Services Volunteer Corps.
It seems we are always hosting small delegations from all the corners of the world. If anyone is interested in this training resource, just let me know or send an email.
Technological advances have transformed our markets by making it possible for investors to conduct almost any kind of financial transaction on any market around the world. We, as regulators, must use the same technological advances to devise creative solutions to preserve the integrity of a truly international marketplace.
The industry we regulate is changing rapidly and dramatically and we as regulators will have to respond to those changes.